W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n]

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:00:36 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|776b01df599d747533c69fa32d370e60o9EM1s08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|507C7974.2080801@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

Find response to issue 535.  Feedback welcome.

Regards,
Luc
>
>
>       ISSUE-535 (Grammar notation)
>
>   * Original
>     email:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Sep/0129.html
>   * Tracker:http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/535
>   * Group Response:
>       o The comment refers to the previous working draft. The
>         expression now reads as (term | term) and not (term | term)*
>   * References:
>       o http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-n-20120503/#grammar-notation
>   * Changes to the document: none
>   * Original author's acknowledgement:
>


On 10/09/12 10:52, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/535
>
> Raised by: Paolo Missier
> On product: prov-n
>
> Please verify the definition of "(term|term)*". I believe it should be "matches zero or more occurrences of one of the two terms".
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 21:02:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:20 UTC