W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: prov-dm, prov-n, prov-constraints preliminary staging

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:23:10 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|dcdcde8f1c6d36ca387f4c3693deda21oALHNE08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|50AE5F7E.3070401@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Simon,

It's one of the changes approved as part of ISSUE-525.

We, in prov-dm, do not define specialization as an influence. Others may 
do, and we don't disallow it.
So I wouldn't want to say that specialization is not a sub-type of 
Influence, since this seems
to prevent others from doing it.

Luc


On 11/22/2012 03:53 PM, Miles, Simon wrote:
> Section 5.5.1: "Specialization is not defined as Influence" sounds odd, and I'm not sure what it means. Do you mean "Specialization is not a kind of Influence" or "Specialization is not a sub-type of Influence"? The same issue applies in Sections 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 for Alternate and MemberOf.

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:23:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:23:47 GMT