Hi Simon, It's one of the changes approved as part of ISSUE-525. We, in prov-dm, do not define specialization as an influence. Others may do, and we don't disallow it. So I wouldn't want to say that specialization is not a sub-type of Influence, since this seems to prevent others from doing it. Luc On 11/22/2012 03:53 PM, Miles, Simon wrote: > Section 5.5.1: "Specialization is not defined as Influence" sounds odd, and I'm not sure what it means. Do you mean "Specialization is not a kind of Influence" or "Specialization is not a sub-type of Influence"? The same issue applies in Sections 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 for Alternate and MemberOf. -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavmReceived on Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:23:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:23:47 GMT