- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 23:07:10 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 8, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > Tim, > > Thanks for clarifying. I'll take a look at prov-aq.ttl/.owl when I've got the prov-aq document in something approaching final form. > > (I assume one is generated from the other, so I can focus on either one? I choose prov-aq.ttl.) ttl prov:wasDerivedFrom owl but they're equivalent, so work from the one you wish. -Tim > > #g > -- > > On 06/11/2012 14:48, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> Graham, >> >> >> On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm not sure where we ended up with regard to defining PROV-AQ terms in the prov: namespace. >> >> >> We agreed to remove the AQ terms from prov-o.owl, and make a separate prov-aq.owl to define the terms from AQ. >> Then, all OWL files would be concatenated and made available at the PROV namespace (http://www.w3.org/ns/prov). >> The provenance of the concatenation would also be included when requesting the namespace. >> The mechanics have not been fully implemented, so this will take some collaboration to finish up. >> >> >>> I see that there's a prov-aq.ttl (and .owl) file in the "paq" area of the provenance document repository (apparently created by Stephan), but it currently contains a lot of terms that are nothing to do with PROV-AQ (as well as a few that are). >> >> I dont' recall the details, but that might just be the last copy of PROV-O.owl before we took out the AQ terms. >> So, feel free to remove anything in prov-aq.ttl that is not from the AQ note. >> >>> >>> I also see that a number of PRPV-AQ properties are defined, along with annotations: >>> >>> :aq "http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#todo"^^xsd:anyURI ; >>> :category "access-and-query" ; >> >> >> If you don't need those, then clean them out. They were part of the PROV-O annotations that guide the HTML cross reference generation code. >> >>> >>> Am I correct in surmising that this file is intended to provide the OWL descriptions of all terms introduced by PROV-AQ? >> >> Yes. >> >>> >>> If so: >>> >>> How complete is this document believed to be? >> >> Not sure. Relatively complete? :-) >> >>> >>> Can I assume that the ontology terms introduced here are final? >> >> No. >> >> >>> >>> Are there any further changes that require PROV-AQ editor input? >> >> >> It requires PROV-AQ editor review and guidance. We can help discuss and implement things if needed. >> >> >>> >>> How should I cite the ontology document (currently PROV-AQ references the PROV-O spec, but with PROV-AQ terms not described there, that does not seem like a useful thing to do)? >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ says: >> >> [[ >> The namespace for all PROV-O terms is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#. >> The OWL encoding of the PROV Ontology is available here. >> ]] >> >> Where "here" will become http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o.owl >> >> So, I suggest that AQ.html links to http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.owl >> >> Ivan is the gatekeeper for getting documents into http://www.w3.org/ns (via CVS) >> >> It was decided that the OWL files NOT be in the /tr path because that would "freeze" them and it would be hard to update. >> But we have "free reign" in /ns. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 04:07:37 UTC