W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:25:42 +0000
Message-ID: <5098F3B6.7000209@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I'm sorry I'm late on this - last week was rather busy.

My vote depends somewhat on exactly what goes forward into PR.

If the at-risk MentionOf construct is dropped, I think the remaining constructs 
are adequately covered by the criteria; i.e.

+1

But, if the MentionOf construct is carried forward, I think we need to find some 
way to confirm that the implementations are not only exchangeable with each 
other (as in an "interoperability pair"), but are also semantically compatible 
with each other, and also (in PROV-O implementations) are semantically 
compatible with normal RDF practice and usage.  I.e.

-0

(That is, I'm not seeking to block progress based on the current proposal, but I 
reserve the right to later object that interoperability MentionOf is not 
adequately demonstrated.)

#g
--


On 29/10/2012 12:37, Paul Groth wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We would now like to vote on the Exit Criteria for Candidate
> Recommendations for our specifications.
>
> You can find the exit criteria here:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvCRExitCriteria
>
> The proposal is as follows:
>
> The Exit Criteria defined at
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvCRExitCriteria are those that the
> Working Group will propose as those that need to be met for PROV-O, PROV-N,
> PROV-DM and PROV-Constraints to move from Candidate Recommendation to
> Proposed Recommendation.
>
> Please indicate the support or not for this resolution with a +1, 0, or -1
> and indicate your institution.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 12:33:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 November 2012 12:33:56 GMT