- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:22:21 -0600
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Stephan and team, > > While reading the questionnaire, some questions came up. We may want to > provide some clarification. > - What are we expecting for the entry 'attribute'? I believe you are referring to the first question in the branch for language implementation (page 2 in the form source) which asks about whether the implementation consumes/produces/consumes & produces/does not support a term of the language. I think this was a catch-all term for the implementation being able to handle arbitrary attributes. Perhaps we should change this to 'arbitrary attributes' 'user defined attributes' or something similar? I changed to 'User Defined Attributes' for the time being. > - What are we expecting for the entries 'location', 'value' and 'role'? Does the implementation support these specific PROV-DM defined attributes? (In the appropriate manner for the implementation supported language - PROV-O, PROV-XML, PROV-N, other) > - Why not mention type and label? I do not recall why these are not present, I have added them. Thanks, Stephan > Thanks, > Luc > > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 15:22:51 UTC