W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:08:14 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|ed87f54d0a52f8acd1786375343ca04ao4YB8I08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FC5F18E.5050806@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Daniel,

Given that now alternative is being suggested, I am closing this issue.
Feel free to reopen if you have a concrete proposal.

Regards,
Luc

On 04/19/2012 11:28 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/352
>
> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
> On product: prov-dm
>
> Currently, the DM says:
> A quotation record, written wasQuotedFrom(e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs) in PROV-ASN, contains:
>      quote: an identifier e2, identifying an entity record that represents the quote;
>      quoted: an identifier e1, identifying an entity record representing what is being quoted;
> ...
>
> However, if we say that e2 wasQuotedFrom e1 it may look like entity e1 is the one quoting e2 (since we are saying that e2 was quoted).
>
> I think it would be more clear if we rename the property with e2 wasQuoteOf e1, or e2 hadQuoteFrom e1.
>
> Thoughts?
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 10:09:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 May 2012 10:09:08 GMT