W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:14:13 +0000
Message-Id: <E1SXfML-0001Bf-V3@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/384

Raised by: Luc Moreau
On product: prov-dm


In the example, 
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#anexample-attribution,
we write:
wasAttributedTo(tr:WD-prov-dm-20111215, ex:Paolo, [prov:role="editor"])


But in
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-attribute-role
we say:
The attribute prov:role denotes the function of an entity with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, association, start, and end.


So, 
1. Do we want to accept prov:role in Attribution?
  (or, it's not a prov:role but prov:type we should use?)

2. If yes, does it mean the definition of prov:role needs to be changed?  where is the activity?

3. Should we have an optional activity in Attribution?

Luc
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 21:14:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 May 2012 21:14:17 GMT