PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/384 Raised by: Luc Moreau On product: prov-dm In the example, http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#anexample-attribution, we write: wasAttributedTo(tr:WD-prov-dm-20111215, ex:Paolo, [prov:role="editor"]) But in http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-attribute-role we say: The attribute prov:role denotes the function of an entity with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, association, start, and end. So, 1. Do we want to accept prov:role in Attribution? (or, it's not a prov:role but prov:type we should use?) 2. If yes, does it mean the definition of prov:role needs to be changed? where is the activity? 3. Should we have an optional activity in Attribution? LucReceived on Thursday, 24 May 2012 21:14:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:15 UTC