Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
I believe this issue has been addressed, modulo some points raised in Tim's recent review [1].

Tim, will addressing the related points in your review suffice to close the issue?

--James

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Dm-constraints_review_2012_May_17_by_Lebo

On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm-constraints
> 
> by 3.1.3 Generation
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-dm-20120402/prov-dm-constraints.html#term-Generation
> 
> 
> I was already dealing with (and postponing) "interpretations". The document did not explain to me how or when I should read/use them.
> 
> Now I'm given an in-place constraint and a structural constraint (for generation).
> 
> The only time these were distinguished was in Section 1, which gave a somewhat reasonable summary AS LONG AS the distinction (and how to use them) is explained further down. By this section 3.1.3, it hasn't become clear and I'm now confused.
> 
> Recommend adding a discussion about the distinction among these in Section 1 - as well as at the beginning of section 3 in some meta-discourse.
> 
> 
> This is a BLOCKER for public release of draft, because it leads to too much confusion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 15:03:36 UTC