W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-283 (TLebo): Account, Note, Plan and Location subclasses of Entity? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:33:21 -0400
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8A6BCF04-C093-4C75-A72D-5490B8C332D1@rpi.edu>
wg,

I am closing this issue because Note is leaving DM and provenance of Locations does not seem to make sense (do they move?)
Also, using our current argument for "Agents may be Entities", anyone is free to make Locations Entities of they'd like to discuss their provenance.

Regards,
Tim

On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> PROV-O Team,
> this issue is now OPEN. Currently,
> "Bundle"(old "Account") and "Plan" are subclasses of "Entity" (and as far as I am concerned, there is consensus in that).
> "Note" and "Location" are not entities.
> 
> @Stian: Why do you think "Location" and "Note" should be entities?
> 
> I think that Notes should not be entities. Notes can be entities (they are not disjoint), but
> what are they characterizing exactly? (in the examples they had some non characterizing attributes about entities)
> 
> Let's see if we can reach some consensus in order to close this issue.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> 2012/3/5 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> PROV-ISSUE-283 (TLebo): Account, Note, Plan and Location subclasses of Entity? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/283
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o
> 
> Are Account, Note, Plan and Location subclasses of Entity? (Stian)
> 
>    Yes to Account, Plan, and Location. Note is the fourth (disjoint?) sibling of Element (Tim)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Entity
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 20:33:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 May 2012 20:33:52 GMT