W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:05:20 -0400
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <B9DD58FA-F6F2-4D15-832F-53324F65D0BB@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
I've updated the OWL to reflect this removal.

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/4a589776bff9

-Tim


On May 15, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> We have agreed [1] to drop this concept.  Change is already implemented. I am now closing this issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-05-10#resolution_3
> 
> On 04/30/2012 11:57 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/369
>> 
>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>> On product: prov-dm
>> 
>> 
>> There are regular comments about wasStartedByActivity.
>> 
>> MacTed was saying why don't we also have wasStartedByAgent.
>> 
>> Someone else  was saying, why don't we have wasEndedByActivity? ... and ByAgent.
>> 
>> In the spirit of simplification, we could drop the concept.
>> Whenever we want to write
>> 
>> wasStartedByActivity(a2,a2)
>> 
>> we would instead have to write
>> 
>> wasStartedBy(a2,e)
>> wasGeneratedBy(e,a1)
>> 
>> for some entity.
>> 
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> Luc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 14:05:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 May 2012 14:05:58 GMT