- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:14:13 -0600
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sent from my iPad On May 9, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > > >> As for content negotiation, I think it would be nice >> if http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ was configured to return >> the tagged ontology file as RDF/XML for requests made with accept headers >> specifying "application/rdf+xml". This would be very clean and would not >> result in the ontology specifying a HG dependent URL. > > I am not disagreeing this would be preferable - however we already got > this on http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > The existing content negotiation is one of the reasons I suggested this. It keeps uniformity by using content negotiation with both the latest (at http://www.w3.org/ns/prov ) and with the version tagged ontologies. > >> Our WD tagged ontology would have: >> >> <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#"> >> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">PROV Ontology</rdfs:label> >> <owl:versionIRI >> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/"/> >> </owl:Ontology> > > However I think the owl:versionIRI should give you (some format of) > OWL file no matter how your request it. Is this from a spec? I know of several ontologies that are published and referenced via IRIs that provide both documentation in HTML and the ontology in RDF/XML via content negotiation from the same IRI; and we are already doing so with http://www.w3.org/ns/prov, so why should a versionIRI be treated differently from an Ontology IRI? --Stephan > So if I copy from my text > editor the version IRI and open it in the browser, I should get the > OWL. > > Therefore I would suggest: > > <owl:versionIRI > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/prov.owl" > /> > > (Ie the same as the 'here' link on > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ ) > > You can also have an rdfs:seeAlso to > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ to show the right > version of the documentation. > > > I think for the TR releases this is what owl:versionIRI should say, as > that is what will be preserved 'forever'. The Mercurial site is not > guaranteed to stay there by W3C. > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 14:15:18 UTC