Hi, I just modified the example as suggested. The issue is now pending review, I think we can close it. Best, Daniel 2012/5/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/373 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: PROV-O HTML > > There is a nice progression from the simple ('starting point') terms via > the expanded one to the qualified ones. However... in 3.2 the example uses > prov:qualifiedGeneration although, at that point, the reader does not have > any idea what that means. It is probably not really important in this > example anyway; I would propose to remove it. > > Thanks > > Ivan > > > >Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 13:11:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:14 UTC