- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:28:05 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/372 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: http://www.w3.org/mid/D3BF08F5-B11F-4766-919D-FD81DD9D59C7@w3.org (I have not found yet the semantics document, I am not sure whether what I write makes sense...) Looking at the Prov-o and the qualified terms. Taking the first time in the list, ie, qualifiedUsage. Isn't it correct that, at least conceptually, if I have ex:E a prov:Entity; prov:qualifiedUsage [ a prov:Usage ; prov:entity ex:E ] . then, again conceptually, I would expect something like ex:E prov:used ex:E . to be 'present'. It strikes me that this is exactly what the OWL 2 property chains do (and those are still OWL RL), by saying: (prov:qualifiedUsage prov:entity) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used . Isn't it worth adding it to the OWL ontology? Or do I miss something here? Ivan
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 12:28:08 UTC