W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:04:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4FA23BFA.6020002@ncl.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
agreed

--Paolo

On 4/30/12 11:41 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/368
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> We are having ongoing discussion about responsibility in derivations (see ISSUE-357 and ISSUE-352).
>
> In the spirit of simplification, I would like to suggest that agents should not be mentioned in derivation relations.
>
> Instead of
>   wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,ag,attrs)
> we should write
>   wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,attrs)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e2,ag)
>
>
> Instead of
>   wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs)
> we should write:
>   wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,attrs)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e1,ag1)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e2,ag2)
>
>
>
> We are not losing in expressivity, I believe, instead, we decouple components 2 and 3 in the data model.
>
> Furthermore, if we allow optional arguments in derivations,
> wasDerivedFrom(id, e2, e1, a, g2, u1, attrs)
> they should also be allowed in quotation/original source/revision, to
> make these proper subrelations.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 08:04:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2012 08:04:37 GMT