- From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:13:00 -0400
- To: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 03/30/2012 09:32 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:16, Timothy Lebo<lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >>> So the consumption means the entity can't be used/involved with >>> anything after that - what is then the (later) expiration? >> That the entity can't be used/involved with anything after the >> given time (independent of any consumption). > Reasonable, but is that not out of scope for PROV? That is a plan, or > intended life time. It is like saying the work activity should stop at > 17:00, however it lasted until 19:15. I think you are both hitting the right issue. There is a difference between saying something shouldn't be used and saying it can't be used (i.e. it is impossible for it to have been used). I agree -- we want to handle the later case, not the former. Curt
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 14:13:35 UTC