W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-251 (TLebo): put "location" attribute into prov: prefix [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:54:11 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|10fea5df171da77ce4e4d5199f1c9f7co2RGsG08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F733423.8070703@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,

In the latest version we have addressed this issue.
I propose to close this issue pending your review of WD5.

Regards,
Luc

On 02/14/2012 03:55 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-251 (TLebo): put "location" attribute into prov: prefix [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/251
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dm-20120202/#record-Location says:
>
> "Location is an optional attribute of entity records and activity records. The value associated with a attribute location must be a Literal, expected to denote a location."
>
> but prov:location is not described like prov:role, prov:type, and prov:steps are in http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dm-20120202/#record-attribute
>
> Should it be?
>
> Same concern for "Time":
>
> "It is optional to assert time in usage, generation, and activity records."
>
>
>
> The common attributes seem to be inconsistently presented. "prov:role, prov:type, and prov:steps" are tucked into the "Attributes" section while time and location have their own section and are also attributes.
>
> I recommend pulling the three out of Attributes into their own sections.
>
> -Tim
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 15:54:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT