W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:15:37 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|1a332515108310782abc99e6efa7cc64o2MFFe08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F6C9399.7090806@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,

So, we have dropped the term "Relation" (vs "Element") in WD4.
In WD5, we will have the component structure, which is already in the 
current
editor's draft.

So, I propose to close this issue.
Regards,
Luc

On 02/06/2012 09:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/237
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
>
> I propose to rename "Relation" in PROV-DM to "Involvement" because "Relation" is too broad and a provenance interchange should limit itself to how agents, activities, and entities were involved with one another as the lead to some result.
>
> Relations other than involvements should be out of scope for provenance interchange (and seem to be already be handled with the attribute-values).
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:16:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT