Hi Tim, So, we have dropped the term "Relation" (vs "Element") in WD4. In WD5, we will have the component structure, which is already in the current editor's draft. So, I propose to close this issue. Regards, Luc On 02/06/2012 09:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/237 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > I propose to rename "Relation" in PROV-DM to "Involvement" because "Relation" is too broad and a provenance interchange should limit itself to how agents, activities, and entities were involved with one another as the lead to some result. > > Relations other than involvements should be out of scope for provenance interchange (and seem to be already be handled with the attribute-values). > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavmReceived on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:16:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT