W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-196: Section 5.3.4 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:11:50 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|06a3a13dc7871a9ef9c372677b167fe3o2MEBq08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F6C84A6.9000704@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Satya,

The distinction between note attributes and other attributes no longer 
exist. This
addresses your first point.

Your second point was addressed by email previous.
So, I propose to close this issue.
Regards,
Luc

On 12/07/2011 02:15 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-196: Section 5.3.4 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/196
>
> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
> On product:
>
> Hi,
> The following are my comments for Section 5.3.4 of the PROV-DM (as on Dec 5):
>
> Section 5.3.4:
> 1. "See Section Note for a discussion of the difference between note attributes and other records attributes."
>
> Comment: As discussed earlier, the current description does not clarify the distinction between note and other other record attributes.
>
> 2. "..that the icon (an application specific way of rendering provenance) is doc.png." and "note(n2,[ex:style="dotted"])"
>
> Comment: It is not clear why the above two attribute-value pairs cannot be part of the entity and used records respectively. What is the extra information being captured by creating a separate note record?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best,
> Satya
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 14:12:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:59 GMT