W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Quality check of ProvRDF

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:55:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXt=t1ALN13wLu+P9_CBw=hQMw9KRuuRk1nziUmC5qPA8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
I also think http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Responsibility

should then not  use prov:activity if activity is given in
actedOnBehalfOf(id,ag2,ag1,a) ..

The Responsibility involvement replaces the optional activity
parameter, the binary relationship is to the agent ag1.

prov:associatedWithActivity? (the wasAssociatedWith is
PROV-inferrable, but I don't think we can make it a subclass of
prov:Association, as that's a different DM statement with different ID
and attributes)




On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:03, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 15:38, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> I've looked over part of your mapping, and I wrote down a new design objective "rule".
>> Do you agree with it?
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#4._Naming_style_for_prov:entity_prov:activity_prov:agent_is_RESERVED
>
> I'm OK with the principle, but not sure about the consequences, in
> particular if we use 'had' form.
>
> That would mean the involvements will 'have' things they did not
> really have, but were just properties of the involvement?
>
>
> I believe these are the changes:
>
> :quotation a prov:Quotation ;
>  prov:hadQuoter :quoter ;
>  prov:hadQuoted :quoted .
>
> I'm OK with that, as quoter/quoted are roles in a Quotation acti... involvement.
>
>
> :derivation a prov:Derivation ;
>  prov:hadUsage :use1 ;
>  prov:hadGeneration :gen1 .
>
> Not so sure about this.. The derivation *had* some usage? *Had* a generation?
>
> Perhaps a verb that also signifies involvement of some kind.. the
> generation was the *outcome* of the derivation, and the usage was the
> premiss.  What about:
>
> :derivation a prov:Derivation ;
>  prov:basedOnUsage :use1 ;
>  prov:contributedToGeneration :gen1 . # There might be other
> derivations for same generation!
>
>
>
> And should we then not also rename these back to was-form?
>
> :e2 prov:alternateOf :e1 .
> :e3 prov:specializationOf :e1 .
>
> -->
>
> :e2 prov:wasAlternateOf :e1 .
> :e3 prov:wasSpecializationOf :e1 .
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 10:55:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT