W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-279 (TLebo): Model subclasses of Derivation [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:11:51 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <97E1C98E-EF6F-4759-92A8-C19E7A92FE90@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Yes. Now that Derivation is much simpler, it is not a concern worth an issue.

I closed it.

-Tim

On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> after the agreement reached in the last telecon to simplify the definition of derivation,
> can we close this issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 2012/3/4 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> PROV-ISSUE-279 (TLebo): Model subclasses of Derivation [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/279
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
> 
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPRnXt=HroR82G186UdbCEqK+Vyg9SoVR7c8nFJbLPeKaQOQCw@mail.gmail.com>
> 
> precise vs. inprecise in
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Derivation
> -- we have implemented Daniel's suggest in the OWL  (I did not add the
> mysterious prov:steps - but perhaps Tim can add this, he seems to know
> how. I was hoping we could do this as a subclass of prov:Derivation)
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 23:18:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT