W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

[provo-html] Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:59:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4F5E3970.80909@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

Hi Paul,

Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of 
OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue?

Thanks, khalid

On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119
>
> Raised by: Paul Groth
> On product: Formal Model
>
> The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF.
>
> I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies.
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 18:00:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT