W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:24:37 -0500
Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6ECC1B92-ED5C-454E-8ADE-8A6845F94D7B@rpi.edu>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>

On Mar 8, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Section 2.3:
> 
> "AccountEntity" - why not just "Account".  Also, I understood this was to *be* a bundle, not a container for a bundle.

+1, +1

> 
> The example given has no clear relationship to the description.  I understood the key use-case here was to express provenance of procenance, and that is why we have accounts.  I think that should be stated clearly; e.g.
> 
> "An account is a bundle of provenance statements treated as an entity which may itself have some associated provenance."

+1

-Tim
Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 02:25:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT