W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:46:13 -0500
Message-Id: <31A642CB-C523-421A-B1E1-66362B97727C@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc,

I made several changes to suit ISSUE-262 and ISSUE-263

Can you let me know if your concerns have been addressed so that we can close the issues?

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/91e0b3623c0d

Thanks,
Tim



On Feb 22, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity?  [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/262
> 
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: Ontology
> 
> 
> I am not sure, but it looks like we can write
> 
> :e2 prov:qualified [a Usage
>                             prov:entity :e1]
> 
> and
> 
> :a2 prov:qualified [a Usage
>                             prov:entity :e1]
> 
> where e2 and a2 are entity and activity respectively.
> 
> It seems that the domain of qualified is any element, so it can beany  activity or entity.  This allows any Involvement to be linked with any Element, which is contrary to the table at the beginning of section 4.2 in the prov-dm draft.
> 
> Over the week-end there was a discussion of simplifying hadQualifiedUsage property into something more readable.  My suggestion was hadUsage, or even usage. This would avoid this type of problem.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:46:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT