- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:45:39 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Khalid, You mentioned that the section 8 diagram needs improvement. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O#Qualified_Usage has a diagram that shows the parallel between the unqualified and the qualified. Perhaps you could consider a diagram like this. Regards, Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > For information, Paolo and I have decided to restructure prov-dm (WD5) as follows, > in several components. The intent was to address Jun's comment on core vs common. > > - Activity, Entity, Events > > - Agency and Responsibility > > - Derivations > wasDerivedFrom, revision, quotation, original sources > - Alternate relations (title to be defined) > Alternate, Specialization > - Annotation > - Collections > > So, in other words, we'll drop the common/core. It would be good if it was not used in the prov-o. > > Cheers, > Luc
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:46:28 UTC