- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:09:12 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, the page cut me short:
Time can be incrementally qualified, just like the binary relations.
The following pattern could be used for started, ended, used, and wasGeneratedAt:
:input_1 prov:usedAt "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00" .
:input_2 prov:usedAt "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00" .
:dataSet
prov:used :input_1, :input_2;
prov:qualified [
a prov:Usage;
prov:entity :input_1;
prov:atTime "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00";
], [
a prov:Usage;
prov:entity :input_2;
prov:atTime "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00"
];
.
http://www.w3.org/mid/E1RtEkN-0003xz-Ik@tibor.w3.org
http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHfd8B1a9m=eKCACQJpNZgGR1GJdaiDpNpnTxqycb4LDUA@mail.gmail.com
-Tim
On Mar 3, 2012, at 9:05 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-280 (TLebo): {started,ended,used,wasGenerated}At <-> prov:qualified [ prov:atTime ] pattern [Ontology]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/280
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
>
> Time can be incrementally qualified, just like the binary relations.
>
>
> :dataSet
> prov:used :input_1, :input_2;
> prov:usedAt "2012-03-03T21:04:54-05:00", "2012-04-04T21:04:54-05:00";
> prov:qualified [
> a prov:Usage;
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/E1RtEkN-0003xz-Ik@tibor.w3.org
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHfd8B1a9m=eKCACQJpNZgGR1GJdaiDpNpnTxqycb4LDUA@mail.gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 02:09:41 UTC