- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:56:50 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
prov-wg, I have updated [1] to compare the alignment between PROV-DM WD3 and ProvRDF's LHS. The page now compares: * PROV-DM web page <-> ProvRDF web page * ProvRDF <-> PROV-O OWL file Only one expression aligns between PROV DM and ProvRDF. This is because the strings to not match exactly. I would like to propose that the DM editors consider adopting the notation used in ProvRDF, since the PROV-O team found it easier to work with and we believe that others will find it easier as well. Many of the misalignments between ProvRDF and PROV-O OWL are because ProvRDF has not be fulling reformatted to use the wiki tables. Regards, Tim [1] http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/provrdf-owl-coverage On Mar 1, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Cool stuff! > > Paul > > Timothy Lebo wrote: >> prov-wg, >> >> I put together a view of the coverage between the ProvRDF page and the PROV-O ontology. >> I hope that we can use it as a quantitative way to determine outstanding alignment issues (e.g. ISSUE-276) >> >> http://bit.ly/provrdf-owl-coverage >> >> Comments and feedback welcome. >> >> Regards, >> Tim > >
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 01:57:19 UTC