- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:19:16 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Luc seems a very straightforward solution (although as I recall it took a long time to converge on this). Should this still be at risk? --Paolo On 6/27/12 10:49 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > All, > > At the face to face meeting, we have agreed to rename contextualization and mark this feature > at risk. Tim, Stephan, Paul and I have worked a solution that we now share with the working group. > > Given that contextualization was already defined as a kind of specialization, we now allow an optional > bundle argument in the specialization relation. (Hence, no need to create a new concept!) > > See section 5.5.1 in the current Editor's draft > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-specialization > > Feedback welcome. > > Regards, > Luc > > PS. Tracker, this is ISSUE-385 > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 13:19:47 UTC