Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]

Just added.

On 06/14/2012 12:18 PM, Tim Lebo wrote:
> Maybe it can be a review question.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:05, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>    
>> Hi Tim and Paul,
>>
>> I don't see a consensus emerging on this issue.
>> I keep it raised, for now, while we proceed to
>> the internal review.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Luc
>>
>> On 05/06/12 04:06, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>      
>>> Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention.
>>>
>>> -Tim
>>>
>>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>>
>>>> DM editors,
>>>>
>>>> Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ?
>>>>
>>>> I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely.
>>>>
>>>> The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same.
>>>>
>>>> I think that this naming is a little more natural.
>>>>
>>>> (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm<->    prov-o...)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>      

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 11:26:28 UTC