Re: PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology] from Timothy Lebo on 2012-06-05 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from June 2012)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:30:46 -0400
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9E142135-4C2F-4F83-8C46-5ADA3EDD3D72@rpi.edu>

Note, moved to paq product in tracker.

-Tim

On Jun 2, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/390
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Ontology
> 
> Does PAQ define any terms that need to be defined in PROV-O?
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 17:31:34 UTC