- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:19:52 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, You will see my recent email, with a counter proposal. 3) ternary alternate alteranteOf(alt1, alt2, bundle): the entity alt1 share aspects of alt2 as described in bundle Luc On 04/06/2012 09:23, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All, > > It seems that we have a choice between two options with respect to > hasProvenanceIn: > > 1) do not include the relation at all > 2) include a qualified version of hasProvenanceIn > > Obviously, naming of the relation can change > > Can I get a show of hands from the group just to see which is > currently looked best upon. > > Thanks > Paul > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 09:20:50 UTC