Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution

Hi All,

It seems that we have a choice between two options with respect to
hasProvenanceIn:

1) do not include the relation at all
2) include a qualified version of hasProvenanceIn

Obviously, naming of the relation can change

Can I get a show of hands from the group just to see which is
currently looked best upon.

Thanks
Paul

Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 08:23:58 UTC