Re: inverse counts

On Jul 18, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:

> You're right: it was generated (not used) and invalidated.  My mistake.  Sorry.

No problem. Thanks for clarifying. I wanted to make sure the document didn't lead you to that.

Regards,
Tim

> 
> #g
> --
> 
> On 17/07/2012 18:00, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> :: sigh ::
>> 
>> I think we both got it wrong, how about:
>> 
>> generated
>> and
>> invalidated
>> ?
>> 
>> If you disagree, please let me know so that we can hunt down why you were misled.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> 
>>> Graham, in your prov-o review [1] you said:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> B. Names of inverse properties
>>> 
>>> Para 1: I count *two* exceptions, not just one (used and invalidated)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My count is generated and wasGeneratedBy, not used and invalidated. How did you come up with your list?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Graham
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 12:44:47 UTC