- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:48:20 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all, This issue was implemented a long time ago, with notation 'prov:SoftwareAgent' as outlined here. Closing this issue. Regards, Luc On 19/04/12 15:23, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-355 (convenient-notation-for-qualified-names): introduce a convenience notation for qualified names [prov-n] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/355 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-n > > > PROV-N has a production for typed literals [1]. > > "1234" %% xsd:Integer > "abc" %% xsd:String > > It allows for convenience notation (with stringLiteral and intLiteral) > > 123 > "abc" > > > Qualified names need to be written as follows: > > "ex:Foo" %% xsd:QName > > Which is not very pleasant to read. > > > It is proposed to introduce a convenience notation for qualified names. > The proposal is to use another form of singe quotes for this: > > 'ex:Foo' > > would convenience notation for > > "ex:Foo" %% xsd:QName > > > > PS. At the same time, we should allow for more relaxed local names (not necessarily XML QNames). We should allow prov:qualifiedName in the list of permitted dataytypes in literals. > > > > [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-n.html#expression-literal > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 09:50:07 UTC