W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:09:41 -0500
Cc: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8DC75D2B-7502-4896-9C57-6C65A415A5E7@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Graham,
>>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
>>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
>>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
>>> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>> I'm inclined to say not, but I'm not sure I understand the proposal
> Can I turn the proposal into a question: in the prov-o ontology, I think we
> are going to have a class QualifiedDerivation (TBC). An instance of QualifiedDerivation,
> will it be an object of the universe of discourse?

Yes. But only because a QualifiedDerivation is an Activity (though others disagree on this).

Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 23:10:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC