Hi Jim, On 01/26/2012 01:45 PM, Myers, Jim wrote: > > > Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, > Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, > Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After > removal belong to the universe of discourse. > > +0 -- these seem like 'sub-class of' to me -- having an identifier for > the general relationship type along with the source and target seem to > be enough to identify a particular relationship instance. +0 because > they are still domain concepts and hence in the universe in that sense > > I don't think it's the case: - an activity may be associated with an agent with different roles. - e2 could be derived (precise derivation with activity a) from e1, multiple times, maybe because e1 is used by a several times. Luc -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavmReceived on Thursday, 26 January 2012 13:55:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:52 GMT