W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:16:47 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|afd06b82827462d26448d6ec00d94bb4o0P9Gq08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F2119FF.9090109@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Stian,

On 01/26/2012 09:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:00, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>    
>>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
>>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
>>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
>>> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>>>        
>> -1 - these are relations between and mainly based on the primitives
>> mentioned above.
>>      
> Changed my mind slightly:
>
>   +1 for Association (because an agent can be associated in different
> roles, so this is similar to Usage)
>   -1 for the rest
>    

I am trying to understand the rationale. Are you saying: "If we need to 
be able to enumerate
objects, then they should be identifiable. Otherwise,
say for wasDerivedFrom(e2,e1) there can be only one relation...."

Though can you have different attributes qualifying different instances 
of the derivation?

I don't follow.

Luc


-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:17:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC