W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:09:13 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|1f24e5e595e70e332375ce05808eae8eo0P99H08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F211839.6080900@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi  Tim,

Questions/comments interleaved.

On 01/26/2012 07:46 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to 
>> identifiers before F2F2.
>>
>> For information, we agreed on the following last week:
>> /    *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by 
>> all participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity records" 
>> and otherwise)     SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either 
>> reusing an existing identifier, or introducing a new identifier) for 
>> the objects described." (intent) /
>>
>> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that 
>> belong to universe of discourse.
>> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series 
>> of proposals. Can
>> you express your support or not in the usual manner.   On Thursday we 
>> will  discuss
>> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Luc
>>
>> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
>>
> +1
>
>> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event,
>> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of
>> discourse
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
>> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> -1 + 0 + 1

Can you clarify which you may support/reject? and why?
>
>>
>> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of
>> discourse
>
> -1
>

To understand where people come from, can you explain why?

Thanks,
Luc
>>
>> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>>             This includes Account Record.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>>   Note
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of
>> discourse.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> +1
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>      
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:09:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC