W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:46:18 -0500
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <44E09459-4DB1-4D7C-BC6C-02746428621E@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Jan 24, 2012, at 8:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> All,
> 
> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to identifiers before F2F2.
> 
> For information, we agreed on the following last week:
>     *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by all participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity records" and otherwise)     SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either reusing an existing identifier, or introducing a new identifier) for the objects described." (intent) 
> 
> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that belong to universe of discourse.
> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series of proposals. Can
> you express your support or not in the usual manner.   On Thursday we will  discuss
> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus.
> 
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
> 
+1

> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event, 
> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of 
> discourse

+1

> 
> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, 
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, 
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After 
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.

-1 + 0 + 1

> 
> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of 
> discourse

-1

> 
> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>             This includes Account Record.

+1

> 
> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>   Note

+1

> 
> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse

+1

> 
> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of 
> discourse.

+1

> 
> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.

+1


> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau               
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487         
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865         
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk  
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 07:46:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC