W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:25:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0Dcvs3+JjEOxVZXGpO0LZyRnbtfWcqnd0n=T7yoyK1KAxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 from my part too.

Daniel

2012/1/25 Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>

>  Hi
>
> as discussed, I agree with all the points below
>
> -Paolo
>
>
>
> On 1/25/12 3:38 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
> All,
>
> 24h to go. We are trying to use the outcome of this vote to structure
> tomorrow's call.
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Luc
>
> On 01/24/2012 01:56 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to
> identifiers before F2F2.
>
> For information, we agreed on the following last week:
> *    *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by all
> participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity records" and
> otherwise)     SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either reusing an
> existing identifier, or introducing a new identifier) for the objects
> described." (intent) *
>
> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that belong
> to universe of discourse.
> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series of
> proposals. Can
> you express your support or not in the usual manner.   On Thursday we
> will  discuss
> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus.
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event,
> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>             This includes Account Record.
>
> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>   Note
>
> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
>
> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of
> discourse.
>
> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
>
> --
> -----------  ~oo~  --------------
> Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
> School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UKhttp://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 16:25:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC