W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:09:28 +0000
Message-ID: <4F202938.6010409@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

Hi,

I am not sure if I made up my mind regarding all the proposals. But for 
now, I am inclined to include Entities, Activities, Usage, Generation, 
Association and Responsibility chains as part of the universe of 
discourse. Other concepts and relationships seem not to have a direct 
mapping to the universe of discourse, so I am not sure if they should be 
part of it.

In other words:
+1 for proposal 1
+1 for proposal 2
+1 for association and responsibility chain in porposal 3
+0 for the rest of proposals

Thanks, khalid

On 24/01/2012 13:56, Luc Moreau wrote:
> All,
>
> Paul and I have a strong desire to resolve the issue related to 
> identifiers before F2F2.
>
> For information, we agreed on the following last week:
> /    *All* objects of discourse ("entities") MUST be identifiable by 
> all participants in discourse. Object descriptions ("entity records" 
> and otherwise)     SHOULD use an unambiguous identifier (either 
> reusing an existing identifier, or introducing a new identifier) for 
> the objects described." (intent) /
>
> So, the next challenge (ISSUE-225) is to agree on the objects that 
> belong to universe of discourse.
> To facilitate the call on Thursday, we are putting forward a series of 
> proposals. Can
> you express your support or not in the usual manner.   On Thursday we 
> will  discuss
> proposals for which we didn't reach consensus.
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
> Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event,
> Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>
> Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of
> discourse
>
> Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse
>             This includes Account Record.
>
> Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
>   Note
>
> Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
>
> Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of
> discourse.
>
> Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 16:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC