W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:50:46 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|d20bc7fd254eb92e23ae7f684c5f5665o0IFon08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F183BD6.2090000@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all,

Find a new figure and constraints for wasAssociatedWith(a,ag) and 
wasStartedBy(a,ag).

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#constraint-summary2

Feedback welcome!

Luc

On 01/17/2012 12:40 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/221
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
> For completeness, we should define ordering constraint for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf.
>
>
> For wasAssociatedWith(a,ag), it feels that ag must have some overlap with a.
>
>
> For actedOnBehalfOf(ag1,ag2,a), it seem that ag2 should have existed before the overlap between ag1 and a.
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 15:51:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC