W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:54:21 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|34b19855de77a23c97268c15cc8922deo0BFsO08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F0F022D.2050901@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Also closed, thanks Satya.
Luc

On 01/11/2012 09:34 PM, Satya Sahoo wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> I am comfortable with closing this issue.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best,
> Satya
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk 
> <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Satya and Tim,
>
>     I am now closing this issue, pending review.
>     Constraints for attributes were removed in WD2, and
>     interpretations have
>     now been moved in a separate section, clarifying the issue flagged
>     here.
>
>     Feel free to reopen, if the issue is not addressed satisfactorily.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Luc
>
>
>     On 12/03/2011 12:38 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
>         I have noticed the new distinctions using "interpretation" in
>         the latest draft, and it has made it easier to see the difference.
>
>         With regard to "moving all constraints to one section", I'm
>         curious to see if this makes it more difficult to read and
>         understand any one construct.
>
>         I'll wait and see!
>
>         Regards,
>         Tim
>
>
>         On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:40 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>
>             Hi Tim,
>             Yes, to confirm, we will make the change, but it will be
>             in the third working draft.
>             This said, the current document, already introduces
>             'interpretation' , wherever appropriate.
>
>             Luc
>
>             On 11/29/2011 09:21 AM, Paolo Missier wrote:
>
>                 Tim
>
>                 it does exist. Indeed there are numerous constraints
>                 that I call "non-actionable", such as "traceability
>                 assertion" for example, which describe semantics but
>                 cannot be used to make new assertions, or even to
>                 check consistency.
>
>                 There is a proposal to push all constraints into a
>                 separate section, and in that setting it will be
>                 easier to make this distinction.
>
>                 -Paolo
>
>
>                 On 11/22/11 7:58 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
>                     Luc and Paolo,
>
>                     Does this distinction among constraints still exist?
>
>                     If so, could/is it described in the latest DM?
>
>                     Thanks,
>                     Tim
>
>
>
>
>                                 We are proposing to make a distinction
>                                 between
>
>                             - inferences
>                             - so-called constraints that are there for
>                             the purpose of interpretation
>                             - constraints that need to be enforced in
>                             the data model to be "well formed".
>
>
>
>             -- 
>             Professor Luc Moreau
>             Electronics and Computer Science   tel: +44 23 8059 4487
>             <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487>
>             University of Southampton          fax: +44 23 8059 2865
>             <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865>
>             Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:
>             l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>             United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>             <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Professor Luc Moreau
>     Electronics and Computer Science   tel: +44 23 8059 4487
>     <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487>
>     University of Southampton          fax: +44 23 8059 2865
>     <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865>
>     Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>     <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>     United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>     <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 15:55:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC