W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:59:43 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|bb75a5b7dac4c22f4550bec51e88637do04Gxk08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F05D6FF.5070807@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org


For the record: in today's call, Graham agreed this issue can be closed.
He will review the latest version of the document, and raise new issues 
if necessary.

Luc

On 07/29/2011 10:02 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/57
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product:
>
>
>
> The revised
> (w.r.t. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1ConceptDefinitions#IVP_of)
> treatment of IVP-of, and relabeling as "complement-of" completely
> overturns my understanding of what this was intended to capture. I
> understood the whole point of A IVP-of B was intended to capture the
> notion that A denotes a contextually constrained form of the entity
> denoted by B.  I don't see what useful purpose this relation serves.
>
> > From a practical perspective, given the asymmetric nature of IVP-of
> (as was) it is easy to express the effect of complement-of in RDF by
> introducing a new entity node.  But I see no way of constructing the
> strict constraining role of IVP using complement-of.
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 17:02:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC