W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: PROV-O call summary

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:55:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0DeLn2O5uKqCE2S5eNEWKJnubjiS-12pnnE1CU17FdFsjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul,
our intention is to align the current prov-o draft to prov-dm. That is why
we built a list
of the main differences between both documents. Some of the changes are
inmediate
(like the replacement of Recipe with Plan), but some others raise
discussions that end
up as issues against the dm. However our focus is to align both documents.

Best,
Daniel

2012/1/4 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>

> Hi PROV-O team,
>
> Reading the notes, I was wondering if it's fair to say that most of the
> issues that are there are with respect to issues with the DM and not how to
> model those in the ontology? (With maybe the exception of accounts).
>
> Just trying to get a view on where the team is focusing.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
>> prov-wg,
>>
>> The PROV-O team met today to review a list of topics where PROV-O is out
>> of sync with PROV-DM.
>>
>> The summary and notes are at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**
>> wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_**2012-01-04#Summary<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-01-04#Summary>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 09:56:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC