W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: PROV-O call summary

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:05:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOMwk6zt6ZsTxRty_GLgoFhPmXvY28dxEF5aKDF9qg5e3MiS2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul,
I am not sure I understood your point - our discussions focussed on what
the DM models (from both syntactic and semantic perspectives), since
modeling them in OWL entails both.

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi PROV-O team,
>
> Reading the notes, I was wondering if it's fair to say that most of the
> issues that are there are with respect to issues with the DM and not how to
> model those in the ontology? (With maybe the exception of accounts).
>
> Just trying to get a view on where the team is focusing.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
>> prov-wg,
>>
>> The PROV-O team met today to review a list of topics where PROV-O is out
>> of sync with PROV-DM.
>>
>> The summary and notes are at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**
>> wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_**2012-01-04#Summary<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-01-04#Summary>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 08:08:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:11 UTC