Re: PROV Dictionary

Should Insertion and Removal have optional activity and agent arguments?

Curt

On 12/18/2012 11:03 AM, Tom De Nies wrote:
> Specific questions we have for reviewers are:
>
> 1. Is the notation of Dictionary concepts clear & acceptable for you?
> (in PROV-N and PROV-O)
> 2. Are the constraints acceptable, or are they too loose/too strict?
> 3. Are you happy with the solution to the issue regarding completeness?
> (Tracing back to an EmptyDictionary)
> 4. Is the note ready to be published as FPWD?
>
> We would like to end the internal review after the first week of the new
> year.
>
> Thanks everyone, and happy holidays!
>
> Tom
>
> 2012/12/18 Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be
> <mailto:sam.coppens@ugent.be>>
>
>     Hello everybody,
>
>     The Dictionary Note
>     (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/__raw-file/default/dictionary/__prov-dictionary.html
>     <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/prov-dictionary.html>)
>     has been finalised for review. Feedback on the note is welcome.
>     Could everybody also check the authors of the document? If someone
>     is missing, let us know.
>
>     Thanks a lot!
>
>     Best Regards,
>
>     Sam & Tom

Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 17:50:03 UTC