W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April.

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:02:08 +0200
Message-ID: <EMEW3|c5fecb51ea973a6330694b4d43fac657o3OB2J08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F97CBA0.30806@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,

This would reintroduce responsibility back into component 1, which is 
what we have been trying to avoid.

Luc

On 20/04/2012 16:24, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> Shouldn't wasEndedBy and wasStartedBy be sub properties of wasAttributedTo?
>
>
> I think this also brings up a more general question, Stian.
> With the ease of "toggling" properties around the hierarchy, it would be nice to have owl:Annotations that justify why one is a sub prop of another, referencing the appropriate dm or dm-constraints anchors.
>
> Any interest in trying that out?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>    
>>
>> On 04/19/2012 09:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>      
>>> Seems Tim beat me too it.. but now the question are of the unqualified
>>> properties.
>>>
>>>        
>> yes, he sent a message last night.
>>      
>>> They are currently subproperties of prov:wasAssociatedWith (range
>>> prov:Agent) - but I no longer read that understanding from DM.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> Correct, no agent any more.  It's start/end are part of component 1, whereas agent is in component 3.
>>
>>      
>>> So I've made them as well be simple subproperties of prov:involved
>>> with range prov:Entity. I'm also checking the ProvRDF page.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> I think that would be right.
>>      
>>> Luc, just to check as there are currently a bit of a mess of versions
>>> of DM in Mercurial, [1] is right?
>>>
>>>        
>> Yes, that's the latest, ... and right as far as I can tell ;-)
>> Luc
>>
>>      
>>> [1]  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-wasstartedby
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>>> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>   wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> You are absolutely right. I'll fix that.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:52, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Hi prov-o team,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know whether this is something that changed since our reviews, or
>>>>> whether I missed it in my review,
>>>>> but prov:Start and prov:End should be EntityInvolvement and not
>>>>> AgentInvolvement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Luc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/02/2012 09:12 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over the past couple telecons, you have accepted to review and provide
>>>>>> feedback for the PROV-O documents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please see ISSUE-336 for the information about reviewing PROV-O HTML and
>>>>>> OWL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you could reply to this message when providing feedback, we would
>>>>>> greatly appreciate it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Tim Lebo>
>>>>>>        prov:actedOnBehalfOf<PROV-O team>;
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> --
>>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
>>>> School of Computer Science
>>>> The University of Manchester
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>    
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 10:02:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT