- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:29:32 -0400
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Stian. I added an annotation for prov:wasRevisionOf rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:wasDerivedFrom: at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/4a37e2659b63 and it did not affect the RL-ness. I'll ask if anybody can add justifications for the other sub property axioms during today's call. Regards, Tim On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:54 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:53, Stian Soiland-Reyes > <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> You can describe that easily, in Protege it's just a click away on the >> relation - but this was another thing that brought us out of OWL-RL I >> think. > > Oh no, sorry, I remember now - it was that you had used a pre-2.0 > version of OWL which represented these annotations differently. So I > think it should be OK. You can test with my validator in bin/ > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > >
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 14:30:20 UTC