W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: [provo-html] PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:27:26 -0400
Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-Id: <50A582BC-FC43-4C82-9412-D16FD753B64F@rpi.edu>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Paul,

I agree with Khalid that the new OWL-RL focus has eliminated the need to address any "PROV-O and Vanilla RDF" discussions, since they are one in the same.

Can you provide specific concerns that remain in this particular ssue?

Or please consider closing this and opening a new issue related to your "PROV-O should be easy to SPARQL" point that you've recently raised.

Thanks,
Tim


On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Paul Groth wrote:

> Hi Khalid,
> 
> I would prefer to leave this issue open as a check when the next version of the ontology comes out. This is not just about owl-rl but how the whole thing looks in things like sparql.
> 
> I'm sure it will be resolved but I want it as a reminder to check.
> 
> cheers
> Paul
> 
> Khalid Belhajjame wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> 
>> Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of
>> OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue?
>> 
>> Thanks, khalid
>> 
>> On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Paul Groth
>>> On product: Formal Model
>>> 
>>> The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF.
>>> 
>>> I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 13:28:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT