Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm]

On 04/16/2012 03:50 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> In addition, I would like also to bring the following amendment
>
>     An agent is something that bears some form of responsibility for an
>     activity taking place or for the existence of an entity. An agent
>     may be a particular type of entity.
>
> This would make it clear why attribution links entity to agent.

I like that.

As Paul/Simon point out, there is still an issue about activities
being agents.

Curt

Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 10:18:57 UTC